Sophy wrote:...back in January 2014 I was told that the surgery is only considered feasible when there is no disease except for in the lungs. It doesn't matter if the nodules are causing symptoms so long as they are all inside the lungs.
The surgeon explained this is because after any surgery the body is flooded with growth hormones to heal the damage. This causes mets left outside the lungs to grow faster and makes the situation worse than it would be without surgery. This is also why the second lung needs to be operated on as soon as possible if there are mets in both lungs.
So sad that the medical profession can't pull its collective head out of its rear end on simple nutrients and other anti-inflammatories for surgical inflammation, for old tech that has been simply ignored for 25 - 75 years.
I am so thankful I was aware of the long running Life Extension Foundation cancer articles with substantial coverage on this area, as well as other integrative efforts.
Peri-operative cimetidine is 30+ years old. CA199-CSLEX1 targeted cimetidine is 20+ years old.
Niacin/niacinamide has been known as an anti-inflammatory for ca 75 years. Likewise the pleiotropic benefits of higher vitamin D3 doses and cofactors.
I think Klenner first salvaged someone's botched surgery with IV vitamin C circa late 1940s. The options include continuous drips for several days, and daily infusions for 1-4 hours, for up to a week on so, depending on inflammation, injuries and infection loads.
Some other people have had their liver mets and other mets removed prior to the laser lung surgery and have gone on to become long term NED.
Yep, you have to find some dr to help break the ice and get the ball rolling on a better personalized multimodal plan.
Very important to not get discouraged and to keep moving forward when you encounter Dr. No(s).