Guest T wrote:I wanted to update everyone. We saw a Dr. he is a professor at FSU and director of colo-recatal surgery, and on the staff at Moffitt cancer center. He wants to do surgery to remove the whole rectum and possibly the end of the tail bone. My husband will have a colostomy bag and in my opinion may end up with one for the bladder as well. The reason I think that is because the nerves at the end of the tailbone with have to be sacraficed. The nerve that tells you your bladder is full is located there as well as others. They wont know if they have clear margins until they look at the bone under the micrascope. We cant be sure if they can get all of the cancer until then. My husband is very reluctant to have this surgery. Not only because of the colostomy but it is major major surgery. His healing took 6 mos during his last surgery. I would like your thoughts on this matter. What would you do. Go for the surgery or try folofox with avastin first? Also, anyone that has had this surgery or one like it please chime in and let me know the side affects of this surgery. Please be open as we need to know all of what can happen.
Thanks For your help in this matter.
The problem, as you well know, is that you won't know if the procedure is successful until AFTER it's been done. If it isn't successful, your husband's quality of life will literally be "in the toilet." Unfortunately, chemotherapy doesn't work that well on bone metastases. This is why radiation is usually prescribed. Yet radiation would essentially have the same effect as the surgery, namely, radiation will weaken the tissue in the pelvic area and possibly destroy the nerve in the tail bone that would allow your husband to have normal bladder function.
My father didn't have the option of the surgery you described, but still has serious incontinence issues due to the sacral tumors shifting and putting pressure on the nerve bundle (cauda equina). He ended up with the same problem your husband is facing, but without having gone through the surgery. At the end of the day, that's the result you are possibly facing. If your husband has the surgery, he WILL be incontinent and unable to urinate normally. On the other hand, if he doesn't have the surgery and goes with the chemotherapy, it's quite likely (though not guaranteed) that he'll end up in the same position. However, there are two main differences: (1) your husband may never get cauda equina as a result of his sacral tumors, and (2) your husband will enjoy a higher quality of life in the interim even if he does get cauda equina. In the meantime, it's quite possible that improvements in stereotactic radiotherapy in the next year or so will decrease the risk of damage to the healthy tissue in his pelvic region and spare the nerves in the sacrum that control his bladder.
Bottom line advice: Consider going with the chemotherapy for now and talking to a stereotactic radiotherapy specialist and see what s/he can do for your husband.