beach sunrise wrote:What are your thoughts? I would sure like to hear them.
CRguy wrote:"since he's assuming all is good." and we all hope he's correct BUTT that should be based on medical tests and imaging facts not assumptions
If he's wrong WHO has to get another port put in ..... him ?????
Ok now I'm getting gnarly WHEN a doctor says to me "I wouldn't worry about .... OR IF it were me ..... "
I say It is NOT you AND if it were YOU ..... I wouldn't worry either !!!!! ... and Yes in fact I have said exactly that,
the second time around after my lung met was missed on a CT
CT radiation : yes it is a real risk BUTT again the newer CTs are way lower exposure than when all the "warnings" first started circulating back in my day (10 years ago )
I once told my Onc ( when he balked at keeping 3 month scans versus 6 month scans for a year )
" I would rather die from too much radiation than another missed cancer met because we didn't do the scan.
My life, so it is my choice. "
beach sunrise wrote:2nd look of cap ct scan by hosp where I had surgery at is in. No evidence of metastatic disease. Everything was "normal" except the finding with ab/pelvic vessels it is worded "No significant abnormality." On after surgery report back end of Jan it was noted that I was high risk of venous thromboembolus. Is this connected? I will research but want you guys take on it also pretty please.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests