Alright team, there is a lot of experience here, so hoping to ask for your help with a dilemma I’m facing. I’m an Australian, based in Melbourne. Recently diagnosed stage IV rectal with 4+ liver mets. Yet to do full staging, etc.
We have a very good local cancer centre (Peter MacCallum) that provides treatment through an integrated multi-disciplinary team of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, etc. This is a public hospital and I like the approach. It appears to be very thorough, structured, regulated and of consistent quality. By going here, I would have my “team” in one place, and get a high standard of care (which I realise makes me very lucky, under the circumstances). I basically get to put my faith in the hands of one place.
However, there are of course things they do not offer. Just as an example, they don’t offer the HAI pump for liver mets (seems to be an MSK special!), they don’t have a CyberKnife for liver radiation, and so on. So the alternative I guess would be to get a good leading oncologist somewhere privately, and then put together a plan that has me leaving Melbourne (or even Australia) to head to the US or wherever to get the best possible for each of treatments. The lack of integration around this concerns me – I have read many times here the importance of having a thorough, end-to-end plan, which everyone is clear on and agrees on, and being able to review easily if there are problems or things don't work. But I can’t argue with the approach of getting the best possible treatment for each the different areas, and the success rates of places like MSK.
The personal impact (travel, cost, away from family, etc.) is something I would just have to come to terms with I guess and for now let’s not consider that a barrier (i.e. focusing on best medical outcome).
Does anyone have any advice or personal experiences for me on how to approach treatment? (i.e. "one stop shop" or "best of breed"?)
Thanks!