Hello,
My husband had his 1st colonoscopy at age 52 and was found to have a 40 MM rectal flat polyp which was removed via hot snare. He was told there is a suspicion he has cancer and has been referred to an Oncologist Dr. Jeremy Kortmansky in CT. The waiting is hard not knowing if we are dealing with cancer and at what stage or a pre-cancer. His Pathology is confusing and took longer to get results because I believe the pathologist thought he was looking at 2 different polyps, when it's actually one 40 MM taken out piecemeal. My father just passed in Oct from Stage IV colon cancer after being diagnosed for 6 weeks. So to go through this again is hard and I'm stressed. I appreciate any insight you all might have given your unfortunate experiences.
Here are his Colonoscopy and MRI/Pelvis results.
Colonoscopy Pathology (note: both polyps discussed below are actually from the same polyp. These must have been submitted in multiple segments.)
Rectum polyp biopsy:
Multiple fragments of tubulovillous adenoma with areas of high grade dysplasia and focal areas suspicious for invasive carcinoma (see note)
Rectum polyp, hot snare:
Multiple fragments of tubulovillous adenoma with areas of high grade dysplasia and at lease intramucosal carcinoma (see note)
Note: Discussion with Dr. reveals that part 2 and 4 are biopsies from the same lesion and histologically show similar findings. The polyp reveals multiple fragments of tubulovillous adenoma with high grade dysplasia. In many areas, the architecture of the adenomatous gland is complex with focal cribriforming consistent with intramucosal carcinoma. The sections reveal focal areas of smaller angulated glands and single infiltrating cells in the deeper part of the lesion that are suggestive of stromal invasion, which is at least intramucosal. Some of the single cells in the stroma have the morphology of Paneth cells: however, Innunostain for chromogranin highlights some of these cells suggesting these are likely isolated or small clusters of endocrine cells. Immunostain or keratin also highlights these small clusters of endocrine cells and few other single infiltrating cells. In the deeper part of the biopsy in one fragment near the area of cautery, few mucin pools and floating tumor cells clusters suggesting of superficial submucosal invasion are also identified.
Although definite submucosal invasive carcinoma is difficult to confirm in these biopsy fragments, at least follow up examination with deeper and more biopsies are suggested to exclude an invasive carcinoma. Complete excision of this lesion (possibly with EMR) or resection can also be a consideration, if clinically indicated. The case has been discussed with his Dr.
MRI Pelvis W WO IV Contrast
No definite rectal mass is identified.
There is a 0.7 cm midline prostate cyst, possibly a utricle cyst.
There is a 0.9 cm left superior rectal lymph node. There is no free fluid in the pelvis.
No aggressive osseous lesion.
Impression:
No definite rectal mass identified. There is a nonspecific 9MM superior rectal Lymph node.