Postby Val*pal » Fri Nov 20, 2015 11:27 pm
Jortega:
My husband had peritoneal mets. His colon cancer "skipped" the liver, though he did develop lung mets.
Sadly, his peritoneal mets did not respond to the chemo in the long run. They were stabilized for a time with Folfiri/Avastin (his second line of chemo), but then began to rapidly grow into small tumors that pressed into his intestines and colon. His oncologist then tried Erbitux, but it was totally ineffective. He began to experience partial colon blockages that resolved themselves but caused vomiting, discomfort, and several hospitalizations. By this time cachexia had set in. His weight began to drop dramatically, and he could not eat much of anything. It was all downhill from there, despite his refusal to believe he would die.
He did not have a lot of pain, but he did have discomfort from the ascites and the other complications that began to develop. Essentially, he passed away after his liver began to fail from all the stress the cancer was causing. His passing was very peaceful.
As far as Hipec, there is little evidence that it "cures" the cancer in the peritoneum and abdominal area. Though it's true that once in a great while the "perfect" candidate for Hipec does benefit from its use, many people are not "perfect" candidates. My husband was definitely not a candidate due to the fact that he had a very aggressive form of colon cancer and had widespread lymph node involvement. Also, my husband suffered tremendous complications from the relatively "simple" colon resection surgery, and he ended up hospitalized for 7.5 weeks. There is no way he would have considered the very invasive Hipec surgery. The major cancer center at which he was eventually treated does not endorse Hipec and will not perform it since there has been no documented studies that prove its effectiveness. At least that was their policy as of May 2014.
This is just my personal opinion, but I feel that Hipec is probably over used. I certainly understand why patients opt for it, especially when they are still quite young, but the fact of the matter is that at this time peri mets are very troublesome. Hopefully, something will be found to treat them more effectively soon.
DH dx'ed May '11, age 62
Jul '11: resection Stage IV
10/11: 6 mo Folfox
8/12:thyr canc, surg/tx
2/13: peri mets
2/13: Firi/Avas
6/13: Ok
8/13: break
10/13: Lung, peri, mets
10/13: Firi/Erb
1/14: Erb Fail; spread
5/14: Tx stopped
6/20/14: At rest