rp1954 wrote:The apparent contradiction is in their minds, built on too simplistic models and assumptions, with lack of attention to crucial data, scientific results, practical results and observations.
ieowi: ...i thought to report what he said maybe someone would find it useful.i would however still show these papers to another oncologist if i had a chance i am sure he was inclined to not give us anything beside chemo. at least i tried to ask
Those of us that are actively pursuing these extra options, take charge of the situation. Typically a separate alternatives doctor handles the altermatives stuff and adminsitration. Even then you may have varied degrees of cooperation or static from the conventional oncologists. Some of the technical professionals go pretty heavily DIY.
The optimum use of vitamin C may result in a different chemo formulation than present, but it does seem to work well long term with 5FU compounds and Folfiri, for patients that were Kras/Braf mutant, elevated histamine or CA19-9+e-selectin with a lot of overlap in there. Shorter term uses may still benefit others.
High concentration vitamin C has multiple faces and roles at different locations within radically different chemical environments. The doctors will speak different "compartments", with different species accumulating or reacting at different sites. Vitamin C may work better in different forms for different applications. It is kind of amazing how little *productive* federal research has been done since 1940 on vitamin C to follow substantial preliminary results in obvious applications, much easier than cancer.
thank you for your additional comments