One of the ideas that circulate among proponents of alternative therapy for cancer is that cancer thrives on sugar and because of this, cancer can be starved to death by avoiding to eat sugar.
It is claimed that the idea is backed up by hard core science – the Warburg effect, which landed the discoverer the Nobel Prize.
Today we know and understand that things are more complicated than that.
In this post we will attempt to simplify the biochemistry/physiology involved and explain why the idea of a sugar depleted diet as cancer treatment doesn’t work in the real world....
........we will focus on glucose, because glucose metabolism is what the cancer-feeds-on-sugar myth is about.
Mydogphoebe wrote:One of the ideas that circulate among proponents of alternative therapy for cancer is that cancer thrives on sugar and because of this, cancer can be starved to death by avoiding to eat sugar.
- Cells don’t distinguish between glucose (a sugar) from different sources
- Large amounts of glucose are often – but not always – used by cancer cells
- Large amounts of glucose are sometimes used by normal cells
Consequently, a sugar depleted diet is not a cure for cancer
Carolinabluetec wrote:I prefer my sugar converted to its most noble form. Alcohol
bitchslapped wrote:You ever notice @ gatherings, the women are hanging around the food & the men hanging around the booze?
Return to “Colon Talk - Colon cancer (colorectal cancer) support forum”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 154 guests