Postby weisssoccermom » Tue May 08, 2012 9:37 am
Jeanette,
First of all, you have to know which test you had done. Yes, there are TWO different CEA tests (actually the same test but done with a different reagent) that have two different sets of parameters.
Until about two years ago, there really was only one test - at the time it was simply called the BAYER test. Since then, Siemens has purchased Bayer so now it is sometimes referred to as the Bayer/Siemens test or simply the Siemens test. The 'normal' range for a nonsmoker is between 0 - 2.5 or 3 (I have seen one lab say the high is 2.5 and another say 3). For smokers, the range is higher - I believe up to 5.
The other CEA test uses a different reagent and is called the ROCHE test - this was the 'second' testing that is being used more and more frequently. Same test - different reagent - different 'normal' values. My lab uses the Siemens test so honestly, I haven't seen the normal values for the Roche test, however, I do know that those normal values are higher. If memory serves me correctly, the normal for the Roche test for a non-smoker is upwards of 5. Be aware though - you can't interchange values from one test to another.
I don't know how your lab works - mine has printed on the actual piece of paper the name of the testing agent (in my case Siemens) that was used when processing my blood sample. I'm a huge advocate for actually SEEING your reports/blood work, etc. so that you really know what you are dealing with. Regardless which test was done, your level of 2.3 is well within the normal range, but, if I were you, I would want to know which testing method was utilized.
Don't bank everything solely on your CEA level. Remember that people without colorectal cancer (or any cancer for that matter) have normal levels of CEA in their blood. That doesn't mean, however, that you should just dismiss your levels either. It's just one piece of information that the doctor uses to keep track of a person's health. Also, be aware that not everyone's tumor gives off the protein that the test is designed to detect. For example, I had a fairly large rectal tumor at dx but my CEA was 0.5- well within normal range! For me, CEA wasn't a good indicator but for others it is - just remember that everyone's situation is different.
Jaynee
Dx 6/22/2006 IIA rectal cancer
6 wks rad/Xeloda -finished 9/06
1st attempt transanal excision 11/06
11/17/06 XELOX 1 cycle
5 months Xeloda only Dec '06 - April '07
10+ blood clots, 1 DVT 1/07
transanal excision 4/20/07 path-NO CANCER CELLS!
NED now and forever!
Perform random acts of kindness