I didn't "quote" this properly from Discoclub, but here it is:
"Dozens of therapies exist. Some are technological advances, some are Bio-chemical, some are focused on Cytotoxicity of natural origins. Laser, Microwaves, Genetics, even NanoTech is just around the corner.
Are these "Alternative"? Some of these may become mainstream in the next few years after enough research has been performed. These advances "work" now, they just have yet to be accepted.
Remember, even 5FU was once an "alternative" until it could get through the FDA testing protocol. "
There is a HUGE difference between alternative therapies and experimental or investigational drugs that are being studied for future FDA approval. The drugs that are now approved for treatment of colorectal cancer were NEVER considered alternative treatments. Experimental drugs in current clinical trials for any cancer are also NOT considered alternative treatments.
Alternative therapies are ones that either have been studied and have been shown not to work, or ones that simply haven't been studied at all. In other words, they are UNPROVEN treatments that are used instead of traditional treatments.
There are also complementary therapies, which are different than alternative therapies - they are used in addition to traditional treatment (not instead, like alternatives). Many complementary therapies have been proven to work, meaning that they might relieve symptoms or help with quality of life issues. It is also being shown more and more that complementary things like exercise may actually increase survival as well (yeah!).
There is so incredibly much we don't know about cancer - probably much more than we know. Again, what we do know about alternative therapies is that they are unproven. Some have been studied and have been proven NOT to work, and some have just never been studied.
For an example of a "non-study" of alternative methods, we could ask every survivor on this board to not have surgery or chemo and to do something different every day - go swimming, eat peanut butter, watch Grey's Anatomy, send their mother an email, call their best friend, eat oregano, etc. Every person could pick his or her daily activity and log the "results". At the end of the year, if five people who watched Grey's Anatomy didn't have a recurrence, would you ditch your chemo and start watching TV instead??
That's nuts - it's just not reasonable to rely on a few individual stories of alternative treatments like vitamins and supplements "curing" cancer. It is also so unfair and unethical to use a few stories from individuals to attempt to "prove" things that are simply not true.
I will be the first to say that I have some issues with the way the FDA handles new therapies - I do think that to an extent, it can "hold back" new treatments, which is a whole other thread I won't get started on. However, the research methods in the U.S. are designed to be as cautious as possible with people's lives and to not treat human beings as guinea pigs in drug laboratories.
I am not saying that the system is 100% perfect, but I do think it is the best one out there, one that balances research and advances with protecting lives. We are lucky to live in a country where we don't condone people who say things like "Grey's Anatomy cures cancer because I watched it for a year and I'm cancer-free." It is so tempting to believe that something so easy will work, but it's just not true.
Although you don't usually see me doing this, the American Cancer Society has a great page that explains Complementary and Alternative Methods (CAM):
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/conte ... uction.asp
There are so many good conversations to be had about CAM, and about 99% of the people on this board are having those conversations in good ways. So please, please just continue to be careful about how you talk about these things. I don't think anybody here wants one person or one message to give the wrong idea to someone who may be here for the first time, or someone newly-diagnosed who is looking for information.
I am getting off my soapbox now...
Hannah
Hannah K. Vogler
Co-Founder, The Colon Club
cousin of Amanda Sherwood Roberts
dx 1/99 Stage III at age 24
died January 1, 2002 at age 27