Postby nodo » Fri Feb 23, 2007 3:36 pm
My oncologists in Texas have basically told me that the earlier you catch a recurrence, the more likely you will be to treat it successfully. The smaller the recurrence, the more likely it would be operable and then treatable with chemo. That being said, they are doing CTs, xrays and blood work. Blood work is not always reliable; therefore, there is a need for the additional testing. I had normal CEA on the day of my colon resection and I was a stage IIIC. They also told me that CTs would pick up a tumor approximately 3 months before I would feel any kind of pain or pressure. Now, that's not an absolute, but they feel the more testing you do (without overdoing it), the higher the chances are of successfully treating a recurrence. I am in my 30s and they felt that the follow up should be aggresssive. My local oncologist, who is just wonderful, did not feel the need for such aggressive follow up. He only wanted to do the blood work. When I questioned him on this, he said that "there have not been any studies" showing that doing regular CTs/xrays increases chances of survival following a recurrence. That just doesn't make sense to me, which is why I sought the advice of oncologists in Texas. If you have one small met that is operable, I would sure as heck rather know about it at that stage than when it grew larger, multiplied and was inoperable. Aggressive follow up is very important. You need to decide what is best for you and find a doctor that will give that to you.